KNEE ARTHROGRAPHY RECORDED ON HIGH-DETAILED FILM-SCREEN COMBINATIONANETRELLA LJ; ARCOMANO JP.1979; RADIOLOGY; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 132; NO 3; PP. 743; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

EMPFINDLICHKEITSZAHLEN VON FILM-FOLIEN-KOMBINATIONEN FUER DIE MEDIZINISCHE DIAGNOSTIK = NOMBRES DE SENSITILITE DES COMBINAISONS FILM-ECRAN POUR LE DIAGNOSTIC MEDICALGUANG QIAN HE; HOESCHEN D; MIRANDE W et al.1982; ROEFOE. FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER ROENTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NUKLEARMEDIZIN; ISSN 0340-1618; DEU; DA. 1982; VOL. 137; NO 6; PP. 718-723; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

KILOVOLTAGE BOOTSTRAP SENSITOMETRYYESTER MV; BARNES GT; KING MA et al.1980; RADIOLOGY; ISSN 0033-8419; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 136; NO 3; PP. 785-786; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

STEP-WEDGE SENSITOMETRYHALE J; BLOCH P.1978; RADIOLOGY; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 128; NO 3; PP. 820-821; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

EFFECT OF CROSSOVER EXPOSURE ON RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE QUALITY OF SCREEN-FILM SYSTEMSKUNIO DOI; LEN NIEN LOO; MCDOWELL ANDERSON JR T et al.1981; RADIOLOGY; ISSN 0033-8419; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 139; NO 3; PP. 707-714; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF SEVERAL RARE-EARTH FILM-SCREEN SYSTEMSBRAUN M; WILSON BC.1982; RADIOLOGY; ISSN 0033-8419; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 144; NO 4; PP. 915-919; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

EVALUATION OF A NEW X-RAY FILM WITH REDUCED CROSSOVERRAO GUV; FATOUROS PP.1979; MED. PHYS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 6; NO 3; PP. 226-228; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

INVESTIGATION OF AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR PRODUCING HIGH QUALITY LOW-RADIATION MAMMOGRAPHSRICHER S.1979; J. APPL. PHOTOGR. ENGNG; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 5; NO 3; PP. 160-162; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

A QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION OF FILM AND FILM/SCREEN COMBINATIONS FOR MAMMOGRAPHIC EXAMINATIONMOORES BM; HUFTON AP; WRIGLEY C et al.1979; BRIT. J. RADIOL.; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 52; NO 620; PP. 626-632; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

THE ENERGY DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR OF NOISE WIENER SPECTRA IN THEIR LOW-FREQUENCY LIMITS: COMPARISON WITH SIMPLE THEORYVYBORNY CJ; LEH NIEN LOO; KUNIO DOI et al.1982; RADIOLOGY; ISSN 0033-8419; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 144; NO 3; PP. 619-622; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

AN EVALUATION OF FOUR RARE-EARTH FILM-SCREEN COMBINATIONSNETTLE JRL; RITCHINGS RT.1980; BR. J. RADIOL.; ISSN 0007-1285; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 53; NO 634; PP. 965-968; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

EVALUATION OF MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREEN-FILM SYSTEMSARNOLD BA; WEBSTER EW; KALISHER L et al.1978; RADIOLOGY; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 129; NO 1; PP. 179-185; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

ERBIUM FILTRATION IN IODINE CONTRAST STUDIESPREVITTE RG JR.1982; RADIOL. TECHNOL.; ISSN 0033-8397; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 53; NO 5; PP. 399-405; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

PERFORMANCE OF AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE CONTROLS WHEN USED WITH RARE-EARTH INTENSIFYING SCREENSOLSON A; HIGH M.1981; RADIOLOGY; ISSN 0033-8419; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 140; NO 2; PP. 491-498; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

RADIOGRAPHIC MOTTLE: A COMPREHENSIVE THEORYBARNES GT.1982; MEDICAL PHYSICS (LANCASTER); ISSN 0094-2405; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 9; NO 5; PP. 656-667; BIBL. 39 REF.Article

IMAGE INFORMATION TRANSFER PROPERTIES OF X-RAY FLUORESCENT SCREENSDICK CE; MOTZ JW.1981; MED. PHYS. (LANC.); ISSN 0094-2405; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 8; NO 3; PP. 337-346; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

RELATIVE EFFICIENCIES OF ENERGY TO PHOTOGRAPHIC DENSITY CONVERSIONS IN TYPICAL SCREEN-FILM SYSTEMSVYBORNY CJ; METZ CE; DOI K et al.1980; RADIOLOGY; ISSN 0033-8419; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 136; NO 2; PP. 465-471; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

COMPARISON AND VARIATIONS OF THE SPEED OF RADIOGRAPHIC FILMDANIELS C; HOLLOWAY AF.1983; RADIOLOGY; ISSN 0033-8419; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 146; NO 1; PP. 203-207; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

DETECTIVE QUANTUM EFFICIENCY IN X-RAY SCREEN-FILM SYSTEMSMARONI C; ZAMBONI R.1982; OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS; ISSN 0030-4018; NLD; DA. 1982; VOL. 44; NO 2; PP. 73-78; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SCREEN RESOLUTION IN TREATMENT VERIFICATIONDROEGE RT; CYTACKI EP.1982; INT. J. RADIAT. ONCOL., BIOL., PHYS.; ISSN 0360-3016; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 8; NO 5; PP. 873-877; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

QUALITY CONTROL IN MAMMARY RADIOGRAPHYKARILA K.1981; ACTA RADIOL., ONCOL.; ISSN 0349-652X; SWE; DA. 1981; VOL. 20; NO 3; PP. 213-221; BIBL. 34 REF.Article

CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT OF HIGH-ENERGY RADIOTHERAPY FILMSREINSTEIN LE; ORTON CG.1979; BRIT. J. RADIOL.; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 52; NO 623; PP. 880-887; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

STRAHLENBELASTUNG DER MAMMOGRAPHIE FUER VERSCHIEDENE BILDUEBERTRAGUNGSSYSTEME = CHARGE EN RAYONS DE LA MAMMOGRAPHIE POUR DIFFERENTS SYSTEMES D'ENREGISTREMENT DE L'IMAGEHEEP H; BUELOW JOHANSEN T; KLEMENCIC J et al.1978; FORTSCHR. GEB. ROENTGENSTRAHL. NUKLEARMED.; DEU; DA. 1978; VOL. 129; NO 3; PP. 364-367; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF TWO DETAIL SCREEN-FILM SYSTEMS USING A RHEUMATOID EROSION MODELDE SMET AA; GOIN JE; ARNETT GR et al.1983; INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY; ISSN 0020-9996; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 18; NO 4; PP. 359-363; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

MINIMUM BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER MEASURED BY MAGNIFICATION ANGIOGRAPHYSANDOR T; ADAMS DF.1979; AMER. J. ROENTGENOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 132; NO 3; PP. 433-436; BIBL. 4 REF.Article